‘Souverain’ is not a flag
People use the term ‘sovereign cloud’ as casually as they tick a box. Behind the term lies a profession, a law, and a single defining characteristic.
People use the term ‘sovereign cloud’ as casually as they tick a box. Behind the term lies a profession, a law, and a single defining characteristic.
We talk about the cloud, data, and jurisdiction. We forget that all of this runs on electricity, and that electricity now depends on storage capacities beyond our control.
The debate over the sovereign cloud assumes that we control the servers. Inside the servers are chips, and behind the chips lies a supply chain in which almost no link is European.
While the debate rages over sovereign cloud, two protocols are holding everything else together. No one pays them any attention, yet they have clearly defined control points.
When we talk about a sovereign cloud, we tend to overlook the layer beneath it. The antennas, the routers, the core network—whoever manufactures them holds a key that the cloud provider doesn't have.
The GDPR is cited as proof of digital independence. This confuses an individual right with industrial policy. Two questions, two answers, and a knot to untangle.
Every time a cutting-edge model is released, the question comes up again. It’s framed incorrectly: what Europe lacks isn’t talent—it’s the foundation. And not all applications need it.
Open source offers real freedom, but it is limited. The issue of sovereignty isn't about proprietary versus open source: it's about which layer depends on whom, and whether we can break free from it.
We contrast Mistral with OpenAI just as we contrast OVH with AWS. In both cases, we think we’re comparing two competitors. We’re actually comparing two different business models.
You take a stake in a strategic tech company and think you've bought power. What you've actually bought is a dividend. Power is found elsewhere—in the articles of incorporation.
An embassy enforces a state’s laws on territory that is not its own. This model dates back several centuries; it works, and it sheds light on what “sovereign legal space” means in the digital age.